Triple
T2451595
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epistle to Philemon |
E53716
|
entity |
| Predicate | centralAppeal |
P39939
|
FINISHED |
| Object | receive Onesimus as a beloved brother in Christ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: receive Onesimus as a beloved brother in Christ | Statement: [Epistle to Philemon, centralAppeal, receive Onesimus as a beloved brother in Christ]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: centralAppeal Context triple: [Epistle to Philemon, centralAppeal, receive Onesimus as a beloved brother in Christ]
-
A.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
B.
ultimateAppealLiesTo
Indicates that the final level of appeal or review authority for a decision or case rests with a specified entity or body.
-
C.
centralIn
Indicates that one entity occupies a central or most important position within another entity, context, or structure.
-
D.
levelOfAppeal
Indicates the degree or intensity to which something is attractive, interesting, or desirable to someone or something.
-
E.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495d227c8190b26ae6548eeb1019 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd2bc7b5481908b3664495e99f1a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0aed2688190a18fe66b98d80e0b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd2baee308190bdaa41ef1f6bc9cc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.