Triple

T24514394
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Czeremcha E606319 entity
Predicate hasBorderAreaStatus P156573 FINISHED
Object borderland settlement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: borderland settlement | Statement: [Czeremcha, hasBorderAreaStatus, borderland settlement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBorderAreaStatus
Context triple: [Czeremcha, hasBorderAreaStatus, borderland settlement]
  • A. hasBorderCode
    Indicates that there is an associated code or identifier specifying the type or status of a border between entities.
  • B. hasBorderThrough
    Indicates that a border between two regions or entities passes through or along a specified intermediate area, feature, or object.
  • C. hasBorderElement
    Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with another entity that forms part of its boundary or edge.
  • D. hasCrossBorderArea
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or spans a geographic area that extends across national or jurisdictional borders.
  • E. hasBorderRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific functional or administrative role related to a border or boundary between regions or jurisdictions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2c4c725148190a4e41577c5cb409c completed April 17, 2026, 11:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f2a9d912e88190bc39c05a9d7f407e completed April 30, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f2a6a4580481908fddc385f5262f95 completed April 30, 2026, 12:47 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f2a9d795288190916368e3cec1f666 completed April 30, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 2:24 a.m.