Triple
T2447710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fibre Channel |
E53631
|
entity |
| Predicate | managementProtocol |
P39915
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fabric Configuration Server |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fabric Configuration Server | Statement: [Fibre Channel, managementProtocol, Fabric Configuration Server]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managementProtocol Context triple: [Fibre Channel, managementProtocol, Fabric Configuration Server]
-
A.
authenticationProtocol
Indicates that a particular method or set of rules is used to verify the identity of an entity before granting access or performing an action.
-
B.
transportProtocol
Indicates the communication protocol used to transport data between entities in a networked interaction.
-
C.
protocolName
Indicates the specific communication or interaction protocol used or associated with an entity or connection.
-
D.
protocolBinding
Indicates that one protocol is bound or mapped to another protocol or transport mechanism for communication or interoperability purposes.
-
E.
supportedProtocol
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, implements, or can operate using a specified communication or interaction protocol.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495d227c8190b26ae6548eeb1019 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abd2bc7b5481908b3664495e99f1a4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd0aed2688190a18fe66b98d80e0b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abd2baee308190bdaa41ef1f6bc9cc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.