Triple
T2446664
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Missouri Compromise |
E53609
|
entity |
| Predicate | declaredUnconstitutionalBy |
P9376
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dred Scott v. Sandford |
E54704
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dred Scott v. Sandford | Statement: [Missouri Compromise, declaredUnconstitutionalBy, Dred Scott v. Sandford]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dred Scott v. Sandford Context triple: [Missouri Compromise, declaredUnconstitutionalBy, Dred Scott v. Sandford]
-
A.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
chosen
Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
-
B.
Ableman v. Booth
Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
-
C.
Paul v. Virginia
Paul v. Virginia is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held corporations are not “citizens” under the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, allowing states to regulate foreign insurance companies.
-
D.
Taney Court
The Taney Court was the period of the U.S. Supreme Court (1836–1864) under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, noted for landmark and controversial decisions including the Dred Scott ruling.
-
E.
Prigg v. Pennsylvania
Prigg v. Pennsylvania was an 1842 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal supremacy over state laws in enforcing the return of escaped enslaved people, significantly strengthening the legal force of the Fugitive Slave Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495d227c8190b26ae6548eeb1019 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abca25a84c8190859bf51000beffec |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69aef0bd7a088190b635a8bac233c5cd |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:43 p.m.