Triple
T243784
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | central limit theorem |
E4991
|
entity |
| Predicate | conclusionDistribution |
P9751
|
FINISHED |
| Object | normal distribution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: normal distribution | Statement: [central limit theorem, conclusionDistribution, normal distribution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conclusionDistribution Context triple: [central limit theorem, conclusionDistribution, normal distribution]
-
A.
typicalConclusion
Indicates that one entity is the usual or expected outcome, result, or ending that follows from another entity or situation.
-
B.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
C.
distribution
Indicates the act or pattern of giving, delivering, or spreading something from one source to multiple recipients or locations.
-
D.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
E.
concluded
Indicates that an entity has brought an event, process, discussion, or agreement to an end, often after reaching a decision or final judgment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c3d0708190b0871c4269d273e6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25dcd2b208190855d5d8d70a3acfc |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b62839c8190824064fe5da6a92a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25dcba5148190ab80fd14c7cf4bb4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.