Triple
T24346441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1994 Stanley Cup playoffs |
E613653
|
entity |
| Predicate | finalsLosingCaptain |
P155800
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trevor Linden |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trevor Linden | Statement: [1994 Stanley Cup playoffs, finalsLosingCaptain, Trevor Linden]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: finalsLosingCaptain Context triple: [1994 Stanley Cup playoffs, finalsLosingCaptain, Trevor Linden]
-
A.
finalsLosingTeam
Indicates the team that was defeated in the final match of a competition or tournament.
-
B.
notablePlayerLosingTeam
Indicates that a particular player is a prominent or noteworthy member of the team that lost a given game or match.
-
C.
managerOfLosingTeam
Indicates that the subject is the manager of a team that lost a particular game, match, or competition.
-
D.
winningCaptain
Indicates that the subject is the captain of a team that has won a particular match, tournament, or competition.
-
E.
awayTeamCaptain
Indicates that one entity serves as the captain or designated leader of the away (visiting) team in a competition or match.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2d7ddd29481909e7f539a6072bd71 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f2932978b88190afc441a3d4805e5f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f287ad30048190b3ad3613486f277f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f28b7ff1808190870dfe9af789a1eb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 1:58 a.m.