Triple
T24292
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Howard |
E482
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithNotableAchievementOfNameBearer |
P1756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FM radio |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FM radio | Statement: [Howard, associatedWithNotableAchievementOfNameBearer, FM radio]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithNotableAchievementOfNameBearer Context triple: [Howard, associatedWithNotableAchievementOfNameBearer, FM radio]
-
A.
notableFor
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
-
B.
notableContribution
Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
-
C.
relatedAward
Indicates that there is an award connected or associated with the subject entity, such as an honor, prize, or recognition related to it.
-
D.
associatedNobleTitle
Indicates that an entity is linked to or bears a particular noble or aristocratic title.
-
E.
notableRelative
Indicates that an entity has a relative who is notable or well-known, specifying that familial relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a243b4ac2c8190b93c303df797b7b2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a246e94ca881908f7a7d2c0b293033 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a246560af88190961ea00b35cf9388 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a246e7fac481909b0c500d4500650e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:34 a.m.