Triple
T2425581
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles Rackoff |
E53517
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems |
E17288
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems | Statement: [Charles Rackoff, notableWork, The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems Context triple: [Charles Rackoff, notableWork, The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems]
-
A.
The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems
chosen
"The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced the notion of zero-knowledge proofs, fundamentally shaping modern cryptography and complexity theory.
-
B.
Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques
"Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced powerful interactive proof techniques to show that finding near-maximum cliques in graphs is computationally intractable to approximate within strong bounds.
-
C.
Håstad’s switching lemma
Håstad’s switching lemma is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory that provides powerful bounds on the simplification of Boolean formulas under random restrictions, with major applications in circuit lower bounds.
-
D.
Blum complexity measures
Blum complexity measures are a formal framework in computational complexity theory that rigorously define and compare the resource usage (such as time or space) of algorithms via axiomatic conditions.
-
E.
Modern Cryptography, Probabilistic Proofs and Pseudorandomness
"Modern Cryptography, Probabilistic Proofs and Pseudorandomness" is a foundational textbook that systematically develops the theoretical underpinnings of modern cryptography, focusing on probabilistic proof techniques and the theory of pseudorandomness.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495c44d48190b7235b23719bc3f6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc99a773c819092d5f3c297b83887 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:45 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69aebf61088481909d79e822e4071456 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 12:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.