Triple

T2421879
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bala Lake E53435 entity
Predicate hasMythology P9595 FINISHED
Object associated with the legend of Tegid Foel LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: associated with the legend of Tegid Foel | Statement: [Bala Lake, hasMythology, associated with the legend of Tegid Foel]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMythology
Context triple: [Bala Lake, hasMythology, associated with the legend of Tegid Foel]
  • A. linkedToMythology chosen
    Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
  • B. hasMythSource
    Indicates that something derives from, is based on, or is supported by a particular myth or mythological source.
  • C. hasMythType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category of myth.
  • D. hasCosmogony
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a particular account or doctrine of the origin and development of the universe or cosmos.
  • E. languageOfMyths
    Indicates that the subject is the language in which the myths associated with the object are told or recorded.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab495c44d48190b7235b23719bc3f6 completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc9f342e88190a430b02842ded418 completed March 7, 2026, 6:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc5a889948190b77de4ef6ac815a8 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:42 p.m.