Triple
T24205807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fit Me concealer |
E600100
|
entity |
| Predicate | compatibleProductLine |
P40829
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fit Me foundation |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fit Me foundation | Statement: [Fit Me concealer, compatibleProductLine, Fit Me foundation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleProductLine Context triple: [Fit Me concealer, compatibleProductLine, Fit Me foundation]
-
A.
compatibleBrand
Indicates that one brand is suitable for use with, or functions properly alongside, another brand.
-
B.
notCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities cannot function together properly or are unsuitable for joint use or interaction.
-
C.
belongsToProductLine
chosen
Indicates that an item or product is associated with and classified under a specific product line.
-
D.
supportsProduct
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, compatibility, or necessary resources for the operation, use, or maintenance of a specified product.
-
E.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288ceaab88190899d0acb5931591d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f27ca63d188190add6c41929bb5cb5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1c43e55688190b55fc20274ed471c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:37 p.m.