Triple
T24134129
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Speyerbach |
E598034
|
entity |
| Predicate | outcomeForImperialTroops |
P19109
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defeat |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defeat | Statement: [Battle of Speyerbach, outcomeForImperialTroops, defeat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outcomeForImperialTroops Context triple: [Battle of Speyerbach, outcomeForImperialTroops, defeat]
-
A.
resultOfSiege
Indicates that one entity is the outcome or consequence produced by a siege conducted against another entity.
-
B.
resultOfMilitaryCampaign
Indicates that one event, condition, or outcome occurs as a direct consequence of a specified military campaign.
-
C.
resultOfBattle
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the outcome or consequence produced by a specific battle or combat event involving another entity.
-
D.
outcomeForBritishCommander
Indicates the result or consequence experienced by a British commander in a given event or situation.
-
E.
largerForceDefeated
Indicates that in a conflict or contest, the side with the numerically or materially larger force was ultimately defeated by its opponent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c92e448190ac57034fa0c863ce |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1df7b6e9c819097fb546efa35821b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1765650fc8190a6bc1eb512b240bf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:26 p.m.