Triple
T23980661
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shinobazu Pond |
E604497
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Lotus Pond
Lotus Pond is a section of Tokyo’s Shinobazu Pond in Ueno Park, famed for its dense summer lotus blooms that nearly cover the water’s surface.
|
E1615142
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lotus Pond | Statement: [Shinobazu Pond, hasPart, Lotus Pond]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Lotus Pond Triple: [Shinobazu Pond, hasPart, Lotus Pond]
Generated description
Lotus Pond is a section of Tokyo’s Shinobazu Pond in Ueno Park, famed for its dense summer lotus blooms that nearly cover the water’s surface.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e29543f40c819087700b7a272afb60 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d2bd58448190a64e7a9020109229 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:43 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0f7e8153d88190b4753be2df39f958 |
completed | May 21, 2026, 9:52 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a0f80e2f8c88190b04dcf47b416f934 |
completed | May 21, 2026, 10:02 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0f81d0818881908066cf3d819cb013 |
completed | May 21, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:27 p.m.