Triple

T23966329
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject KU42 E604091 entity
Predicate correspondsToFAAIdentifier P420 FINISHED
Object U42 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: U42 | Statement: [KU42, correspondsToFAAIdentifier, U42]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: correspondsToFAAIdentifier
Context triple: [KU42, correspondsToFAAIdentifier, U42]
  • A. associatedWithICAOcode
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, or identified by, a specific ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) code.
  • B. isInFAARegistry
    Indicates that an aircraft or related entity is officially recorded and recognized in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) registry.
  • C. FAAcode chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as an airport or facility) is associated with a specific identifying code assigned by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
  • D. aircraftRegistration
    Indicates that an aircraft is assigned a specific official registration identifier or code.
  • E. hasICAOComplement
    Indicates that one entity serves as an ICAO-standard complement or additional code/information corresponding to another entity’s primary ICAO designation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e29543019c8190872462e593cc50b4 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d1d7fbf88190820bcfbdc237c2a3 completed April 29, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f161578d54819084a8b35496299993 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:24 p.m.