Triple

T2389908
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Franco-Czechoslovak alliance E48916 entity
Predicate diminishedBy P9925 FINISHED
Object policy of appeasement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: policy of appeasement | Statement: [Franco-Czechoslovak alliance, diminishedBy, policy of appeasement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: diminishedBy
Context triple: [Franco-Czechoslovak alliance, diminishedBy, policy of appeasement]
  • A. minimizedBy
    Indicates that one entity serves to reduce, lessen, or make as small as possible the value, effect, or impact of another entity.
  • B. reducedPowerOf
    Indicates that one entity has a diminished or weakened level of power, authority, or effectiveness relative to another or to its previous state.
  • C. reduces chosen
    Indicates that one entity causes a decrease in the amount, intensity, degree, or impact of another entity.
  • D. hasDiminutive
    Indicates that one entity is a diminutive form or smaller/affectionate variant of another entity.
  • E. reducedCostOf
    Indicates that one entity represents a lowered or discounted cost associated with another entity, typically compared to a standard or original price.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa5f63081908d07fd302029fcbd completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc7de1478819082238e8b8f88ed06 completed March 7, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc5a1b5748190b4cd8989700f4dd2 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.