Triple
T2374640
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Columbia Human Rights Law Review |
E46168
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | human rights journal |
C11481
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: human rights journal Context triple: [Columbia Human Rights Law Review, instanceOf, human rights journal]
-
A.
human rights clinic
A human rights clinic is an educational and advocacy program, often within a law school or university, where students and practitioners work together to address real-world human rights issues through research, legal representation, and policy initiatives.
-
B.
human rights concept
A human rights concept is an abstract principle or idea that defines the fundamental freedoms, protections, and dignities to which every person is inherently entitled.
-
C.
United Nations human rights review mechanism
A United Nations human rights review mechanism is a formal, periodic process through which UN bodies assess and monitor states’ compliance with international human rights obligations, typically involving state reports, independent expert or peer review, and public recommendations for improvement.
-
D.
international human rights instrument
An international human rights instrument is a formal, legally or politically binding document adopted by states or international organizations that defines, codifies, and promotes the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms across national borders.
-
E.
human rights advocate
A human rights advocate is an individual who actively works to protect, promote, and advance the fundamental rights and freedoms of all people through education, policy influence, legal action, and public engagement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a145268819083e2736cb835c696 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:56 p.m.