Triple

T23725752
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject China–North Korea border system E586268 entity
Predicate hasBorderSegmentType P1972 FINISHED
Object land border LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: land border | Statement: [China–North Korea border system, hasBorderSegmentType, land border]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBorderSegmentType
Context triple: [China–North Korea border system, hasBorderSegmentType, land border]
  • A. hasBoundaryType chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a boundary characterized by a specific type or classification in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. hadBorderType
    Indicates that a boundary between two entities existed and specifies the nature or classification of that border (e.g., land, maritime, disputed).
  • C. hasBorderDirection
    Indicates that one entity’s border lies in, or is oriented toward, a specified cardinal or relative direction with respect to another entity.
  • D. hasBorderMarkerType
    Indicates that a border marker possesses or is classified by a specific type or category of border marker.
  • E. hasBorderElement
    Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with another entity that forms part of its boundary or edge.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24906fb108190a6898751e46bdc11 completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b914adc08190b339c7f83f1536d7 completed April 29, 2026, 7:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f155e4b1148190836ede4741dcb888 completed April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:08 p.m.