Triple
T23703045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Concerto for Cootie |
E585643
|
entity |
| Predicate | composerOfVocalVersion |
P153445
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Duke Ellington |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duke Ellington | Statement: [Concerto for Cootie, composerOfVocalVersion, Duke Ellington]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: composerOfVocalVersion Context triple: [Concerto for Cootie, composerOfVocalVersion, Duke Ellington]
-
A.
vocalGroupVersionOf
Indicates that one work is a vocal-group rendition or arrangement derived from another version of the same musical piece.
-
B.
vocalistIn
Indicates that a person serves as a vocalist (singer) in a particular musical group, band, or ensemble.
-
C.
usesOriginalVocalsFrom
Indicates that one work incorporates the original, unaltered vocal recordings from another work.
-
D.
hasVocalVersionTitle
Indicates that an item has a vocal version whose title is given by the associated value.
-
E.
hasVocalPerformanceBy
Indicates that a vocal performance in a work or recording is performed by a specified person or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24904bd508190abfcb74855de2918 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b684e0a88190b7edeb102585ae9d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155d5265881908e43a9696b6a6d0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f157cc43a881909ed2d8b0a09b5d73 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:53 p.m.