Triple
T23687521
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lewis acid–base theory |
E585208
|
entity |
| Predicate | ignoresRequirementFor |
P6844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proton transfer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proton transfer | Statement: [Lewis acid–base theory, ignoresRequirementFor, proton transfer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ignoresRequirementFor Context triple: [Lewis acid–base theory, ignoresRequirementFor, proton transfer]
-
A.
isNotRequiredFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity is not necessary or mandatory for the existence, occurrence, validity, or completion of another entity or process.
-
B.
mayIncludeRequirement
Indicates that something can optionally contain or encompass a particular requirement as part of its definition or structure.
-
C.
retainsRequirement
Indicates that one entity continues to hold or preserve a specific requirement associated with another entity.
-
D.
doesNotConsider
Indicates that one entity fails or chooses not to take another entity or factor into account when forming judgments, decisions, or actions.
-
E.
rejectedRequirement
Indicates that a proposed requirement has been evaluated and explicitly not accepted or approved.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e249037ce0819088b149608e98f685 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b5bf1c10819085d48c4225cc63fc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155d5265881908e43a9696b6a6d0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:52 p.m.