Triple

T236809
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bengal E4840 entity
Predicate traditionalSweet P8416 FINISHED
Object rasgulla LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rasgulla | Statement: [Bengal, traditionalSweet, rasgulla]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalSweet
Context triple: [Bengal, traditionalSweet, rasgulla]
  • A. typicalFlavor
    Indicates that something characteristically has or is associated with a particular flavor.
  • B. traditionalCuisine
    Indicates that an entity is associated with the customary or historically rooted style of cooking and food preparation characteristic of a particular culture, region, or community.
  • C. traditionalDrink
    Indicates that one entity is a beverage customarily consumed within the culture, heritage, or longstanding practices associated with another entity.
  • D. traditionalOrder
    Indicates that entities are arranged or occur according to a customary, historically established sequence or hierarchy.
  • E. traditionalLifestyle
    Indicates that an entity follows or maintains long-established customs, practices, and ways of living, typically in contrast to modern or industrialized lifestyles.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257c3d0708190b0871c4269d273e6 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25ccc5d548190b505bf1d99db41bd completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b5dc640819092669575731c393f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25c2bda788190bcfc0bc94686f9e0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.