Triple
T23657236
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Gower |
E584337
|
entity |
| Predicate | commentarySpecialism |
P49937
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international cricket |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: international cricket | Statement: [David Gower, commentarySpecialism, international cricket]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commentarySpecialism Context triple: [David Gower, commentarySpecialism, international cricket]
-
A.
commentaryFocus
chosen
Indicates that an item of commentary is primarily directed toward or centered on a particular entity, topic, or aspect.
-
B.
commentaryOn
Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
-
C.
metaCommentaryOn
Indicates that one piece of content provides commentary, reflection, or analysis about another piece of content, often discussing its form, structure, or status as a work rather than its subject matter.
-
D.
commentaryWorkFor
Indicates that one entity performs commentary or analysis work on behalf of, or under employment/contract with, another entity.
-
E.
primaryCommentaryOn
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or authoritative commentary or interpretive discussion on another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248ffc0888190ae23c4731eb8b7ac |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b35c257c81909f7004c0a35be4e3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118d7903c8190bb590a71771e93af |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:49 p.m.