Triple
T236445
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Silesia |
E4833
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Opole |
E28226
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opole | Statement: [Silesia, majorCity, Opole]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Opole Context triple: [Silesia, majorCity, Opole]
-
A.
Opole
chosen
Opole is a historic city in southwestern Poland, known as one of the country’s oldest urban centers and a regional cultural hub.
-
B.
Poznań
Poznań is a historic and economically significant city in western Poland, known for its medieval Old Town, role as an early center of Polish statehood, and status as a major academic and industrial hub.
-
C.
Wrocław
Wrocław is a major historic city in southwestern Poland, known for its picturesque Old Town, numerous bridges over the Oder River, and role as a cultural and academic center.
-
D.
Łódź
Łódź is one of Poland’s largest cities, historically known as a major industrial and textile manufacturing center.
-
E.
Tarnów
Tarnów is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, Renaissance architecture, and cultural heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c3d0708190b0871c4269d273e6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25ccab7648190be6e4f5febc1e313 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a3765a652081909164489d1e3e39f6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.