Triple

T23587439
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Capture of Brielle E582384 entity
Predicate commanderOrLeader P1197 FINISHED
Object Lumey, Count of La Marck NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lumey, Count of La Marck | Statement: [Capture of Brielle, commanderOrLeader, Lumey, Count of La Marck]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commanderOrLeader
Context triple: [Capture of Brielle, commanderOrLeader, Lumey, Count of La Marck]
  • A. commander
    Indicates that one entity holds authoritative military or organizational control over another entity or group.
  • B. hasCommander chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer or leader of another entity.
  • C. hasCommanderRank
    Indicates that an entity holds the military or organizational rank of commander within a specified hierarchy or context.
  • D. commanderAlsoServesAs
    Indicates that the person who holds a commander role simultaneously fulfills one or more additional official roles or positions.
  • E. commanderOfVictoriousSide
    Indicates that one entity served as the commanding leader of the side that achieved victory in a conflict or competition relative to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e248f8d8248190acd5aee77f0d1709 completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b0329f808190b158c9bf68d4fd35 completed April 29, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118c96a0081908a8ac98ef7e7e60c completed April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:41 p.m.