Triple
T235174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Look defense policy |
E4493
|
entity |
| Predicate | followedBy |
P78
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
flexible response doctrine
The flexible response doctrine was a Cold War U.S. military strategy that emphasized a wide range of graduated, conventional and nuclear options to deter or respond to aggression, rather than relying primarily on massive nuclear retaliation.
|
E30120
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: flexible response doctrine | Statement: [New Look defense policy, followedBy, flexible response doctrine]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: flexible response doctrine Context triple: [New Look defense policy, followedBy, flexible response doctrine]
-
A.
substantial effects doctrine
The substantial effects doctrine is a constitutional law principle allowing Congress to regulate even local, non-commercial activity under the Commerce Clause if, in the aggregate, it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
-
B.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
-
C.
General Welfare Clause doctrine
The General Welfare Clause doctrine is a constitutional interpretation that grants Congress broad authority to tax and spend in pursuit of national objectives deemed to promote the general welfare of the United States.
-
D.
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
-
E.
Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice
The Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice is a smaller, specially constituted body of the Court designed to handle certain cases more expeditiously than the full bench.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: flexible response doctrine Triple: [New Look defense policy, followedBy, flexible response doctrine]
Generated description
The flexible response doctrine was a Cold War U.S. military strategy that emphasized a wide range of graduated, conventional and nuclear options to deter or respond to aggression, rather than relying primarily on massive nuclear retaliation.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: flexible response doctrine Target entity description: The flexible response doctrine was a Cold War U.S. military strategy that emphasized a wide range of graduated, conventional and nuclear options to deter or respond to aggression, rather than relying primarily on massive nuclear retaliation.
-
A.
substantial effects doctrine
The substantial effects doctrine is a constitutional law principle allowing Congress to regulate even local, non-commercial activity under the Commerce Clause if, in the aggregate, it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
-
B.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is a 1993 U.S. federal law that aims to protect individuals’ religious practices from substantial government burdens unless justified by a compelling governmental interest pursued through the least restrictive means.
-
C.
General Welfare Clause doctrine
The General Welfare Clause doctrine is a constitutional interpretation that grants Congress broad authority to tax and spend in pursuit of national objectives deemed to promote the general welfare of the United States.
-
D.
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act is a U.S. federal law that protects individuals, religious institutions, and prisoners from government actions that substantially burden their religious exercise, particularly in land use and institutional settings.
-
E.
Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice
The Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice is a smaller, specially constituted body of the Court designed to handle certain cases more expeditiously than the full bench.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257363ffc81909757bde7ab3404da |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25cc9ab2c81909af278a07f86aa1e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:11 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a36478ebcc8190b95419be9bc6bba3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69a3651d2b108190a81d8c3076f6e617 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 9:58 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69a3657903608190988a4c933bbc262c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.