Triple
T23512729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Fifth Amendment Takings Clause does not apply to the states |
E572469
|
entity |
| Predicate | holdingOf |
P152663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Barron v. Baltimore |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Barron v. Baltimore | Statement: [The Fifth Amendment Takings Clause does not apply to the states, holdingOf, Barron v. Baltimore]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holdingOf Context triple: [The Fifth Amendment Takings Clause does not apply to the states, holdingOf, Barron v. Baltimore]
-
A.
holding
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
-
B.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
C.
heldTo
Indicates that one entity is obligated, bound, or accountable to another entity, standard, or agreement.
-
D.
holdsTo
Indicates that one entity maintains, adheres, or remains committed to another entity, such as a belief, standard, agreement, or condition.
-
E.
held
Indicates that one entity physically grasped, carried, or kept another entity in its possession or control.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1aa7f583881909e78e8fe2e6e25fe |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f0bd4a0e408190ad8916faf23562d9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:08 p.m.