Triple
T23474397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 14 |
E570218
|
entity |
| Predicate | enactedBy |
P1115
|
FINISHED |
| Object | People of Indiana |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: People of Indiana | Statement: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 14, enactedBy, People of Indiana]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: People of Indiana Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 14, enactedBy, People of Indiana]
-
A.
Illinois and Indiana
Illinois and Indiana are neighboring Midwestern U.S. states whose shared boundary is partly defined by the Ohio River.
-
B.
Hoosier (demonym)
chosen
Hoosier (demonym) refers to a resident or native of the U.S. state of Indiana.
-
C.
Indiana and Kentucky
Indiana and Kentucky are neighboring U.S. states in the Midwest and Upper South, respectively, separated in large part by the Ohio River.
-
D.
Indiana
Indiana is a U.S. state known for its manufacturing base, rich agricultural land, and iconic events like the Indianapolis 500.
-
E.
Indiana
"Indiana" is a jazz standard widely performed and recorded by saxophonist Don Byas, showcasing his virtuosic improvisational style.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245af8a88819084f2704f6d265a92 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a70363488190bcbdedec5c2a945c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:36 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6 p.m.