Triple
T23428339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Necho I |
E563254
|
entity |
| Predicate | father |
P120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tefnakht II |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tefnakht II | Statement: [Necho I, father, Tefnakht II]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tefnakht II Context triple: [Necho I, father, Tefnakht II]
-
A.
Tefnakht
chosen
Tefnakht was a Libyan-origin ruler and founder of Egypt’s 24th Dynasty, known for leading a coalition of Delta chiefs against the Nubian king Piye during the Third Intermediate Period.
-
B.
Nebkauhor
Nebkauhor was an ancient Egyptian prince of the 6th Dynasty, known as a son of Pharaoh Teti.
-
C.
Amenemopet
Amenemopet was a royal prince of Egypt during the 20th Dynasty, known as a son of Pharaoh Ramesses IX.
-
D.
Shoshenq IV
Shoshenq IV was a relatively obscure pharaoh of ancient Egypt’s Twenty-second Dynasty, ruling during the Third Intermediate Period and known mainly from a limited number of inscriptions and monuments.
-
E.
Khety III
Khety III was a pharaoh of ancient Egypt’s First Intermediate Period, ruling during the Tenth Dynasty from Herakleopolis and associated with efforts to consolidate power amid political fragmentation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24553980c8190bb66a2ae0bdab125 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a54ba29881909945690496f28d65 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:48 p.m.