Triple
T23407061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pingtung County Government |
E559961
|
entity |
| Predicate | headOfGovernment |
P307
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Magistrate of Pingtung County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Magistrate of Pingtung County | Statement: [Pingtung County Government, headOfGovernment, Magistrate of Pingtung County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Magistrate of Pingtung County Context triple: [Pingtung County Government, headOfGovernment, Magistrate of Pingtung County]
-
A.
Magistrate of Taoyuan County
The Magistrate of Taoyuan County is the chief executive official responsible for governing and administering Taiwan’s Taoyuan County (now Taoyuan City) before its upgrade to a special municipality.
-
B.
Magistrate of Taipei County
The Magistrate of Taipei County was the chief executive of the former Taipei County government in Taiwan, responsible for local administration, policy implementation, and regional development before the county’s upgrade to New Taipei City.
-
C.
Magistrate of Penghu County
The Magistrate of Penghu County is the popularly elected chief executive who leads the county’s government and oversees local administration in Taiwan’s Penghu archipelago.
-
D.
Taitung County Magistrate
The Taitung County Magistrate is the elected chief executive of Taitung County in Taiwan, responsible for overseeing local administration and implementing county policies.
-
E.
Pingtung Branch Court of Taiwan High Court
The Pingtung Branch Court of the Taiwan High Court is a regional appellate court in Pingtung, Taiwan, handling appeals and certain major cases within its jurisdiction under the Republic of China’s judicial system.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Magistrate of Pingtung County Target entity description: The Magistrate of Pingtung County is the popularly elected chief executive responsible for governing and administering Taiwan’s Pingtung County.
-
A.
Magistrate of Taoyuan County
The Magistrate of Taoyuan County is the chief executive official responsible for governing and administering Taiwan’s Taoyuan County (now Taoyuan City) before its upgrade to a special municipality.
-
B.
Magistrate of Taipei County
The Magistrate of Taipei County was the chief executive of the former Taipei County government in Taiwan, responsible for local administration, policy implementation, and regional development before the county’s upgrade to New Taipei City.
-
C.
Magistrate of Penghu County
The Magistrate of Penghu County is the popularly elected chief executive who leads the county’s government and oversees local administration in Taiwan’s Penghu archipelago.
-
D.
Taitung County Magistrate
The Taitung County Magistrate is the elected chief executive of Taitung County in Taiwan, responsible for overseeing local administration and implementing county policies.
-
E.
Pingtung Branch Court of Taiwan High Court
The Pingtung Branch Court of the Taiwan High Court is a regional appellate court in Pingtung, Taiwan, handling appeals and certain major cases within its jurisdiction under the Republic of China’s judicial system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454b3a5881909c64773dc8a5d289 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a50e607c8190ba0a22e89862a2d9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:38 p.m.