Triple
T233955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James Barrett |
E4467
|
entity |
| Predicate | militaryAllegiance |
P1201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Patriot forces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Patriot forces | Statement: [James Barrett, militaryAllegiance, Patriot forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: militaryAllegiance Context triple: [James Barrett, militaryAllegiance, Patriot forces]
-
A.
allegiance
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity is loyal, committed, or obligated in support or service to another entity.
-
B.
alliance
Indicates a formal cooperative relationship between entities who agree to support each other in shared goals or interests.
-
C.
militaryOrganization
Indicates that an entity functions as, or is associated with, a structured armed forces or defense-related organization.
-
D.
mainAlliedPower
Indicates that an entity serves as a primary or leading ally to another entity within an alliance or coalition.
-
E.
isNATOAllyOf
Indicates that one entity is a member of NATO and has a formal alliance relationship with the other entity within the NATO framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257363ffc81909757bde7ab3404da |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25f14f72081908182e76300b59358 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b5c8c888190b5544e687736b373 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.