Triple
T23372467
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GL(n,ℝ) |
E593509
|
entity |
| Predicate | isReductiveGroup |
P152477
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [GL(n,ℝ), isReductiveGroup, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isReductiveGroup Context triple: [GL(n,ℝ), isReductiveGroup, true]
-
A.
isReductive
Indicates that one entity oversimplifies, diminishes, or reduces the complexity or nuance of another entity, concept, or situation.
-
B.
isAlgebraicGroupOver
Indicates that one mathematical structure forms an algebraic group when considered over a specified base field or ring.
-
C.
isPerfectGroup
Indicates that the group satisfies the definition of a perfect group, typically meaning it is equal to its own commutator subgroup (has no nontrivial abelian quotient).
-
D.
isRealLieGroup
Indicates that the entity is a Lie group that is defined over the real numbers and satisfies the formal properties of a real Lie group.
-
E.
isSimpleAsLieGroup
Indicates that a given Lie group has no nontrivial connected normal subgroups, i.e., it is simple in the sense of Lie group theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d2593c88190bcdf4a716a94ccb2 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a3af45ec8190a32aa4e5f04f6756 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061c7aaa48190a58ce93f87155ffc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f0bd4a0e408190ad8916faf23562d9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:32 p.m.