Triple
T23354850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bundy standoff |
E593014
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasisClaimedByBundy |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | states’ rights arguments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: states’ rights arguments | Statement: [Bundy standoff, legalBasisClaimedByBundy, states’ rights arguments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisClaimedByBundy Context triple: [Bundy standoff, legalBasisClaimedByBundy, states’ rights arguments]
-
A.
legalBasis
chosen
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
legalAuthorityClaimedBy
Indicates that one party asserts or claims to possess legal authority, power, or jurisdiction over another party or matter.
-
C.
legalBasisWeakenedBy
Indicates that the legal force, validity, or effectiveness of something is reduced or undermined by another factor, action, or decision.
-
D.
legalClaimBy
Indicates that a specific party initiates or holds a legal claim against another party or concerning a particular matter.
-
E.
legalStandingBasis
Indicates the legal grounds or justification on which a party’s standing or authority in a legal matter is based.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d24d2a4819092e6ede74c2a918d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19a169bb88190a2ca659fce1133e5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcfd8d288190937a887fe6023c11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:20 p.m.