Triple

T23336300
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Buccaneer State Park E591594 entity
Predicate partOf P40 FINISHED
Object Mississippi state park system — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mississippi state park system | Statement: [Buccaneer State Park, partOf, Mississippi state park system]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Mississippi state park system
Context triple: [Buccaneer State Park, partOf, Mississippi state park system]
  • A. Missouri state park system
    The Missouri state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and historic sites across Missouri that preserve natural landscapes, provide outdoor recreation, and protect the state’s cultural and historical resources.
  • B. Arkansas State Parks
    Arkansas State Parks is the state agency and system responsible for managing and preserving Arkansas’s network of public parks, natural areas, and recreational facilities.
  • C. Louisiana State Parks system
    The Louisiana State Parks system is a network of state-managed parks and historic sites that preserve and showcase Louisiana’s natural landscapes, cultural heritage, and recreational resources.
  • D. Oklahoma state park system
    The Oklahoma state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and natural areas across Oklahoma that preserve the state’s diverse landscapes while providing outdoor recreation and tourism opportunities.
  • E. Kentucky state park system
    The Kentucky state park system is a network of publicly managed parks across Kentucky that preserves the state’s natural, historical, and recreational resources for public use and enjoyment.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Mississippi state park system
Target entity description: The Mississippi state park system is a network of publicly managed parks across Mississippi that provides outdoor recreation, conservation of natural resources, and preservation of historic and scenic areas for residents and visitors.
  • A. Missouri state park system
    The Missouri state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and historic sites across Missouri that preserve natural landscapes, provide outdoor recreation, and protect the state’s cultural and historical resources.
  • B. Arkansas State Parks
    Arkansas State Parks is the state agency and system responsible for managing and preserving Arkansas’s network of public parks, natural areas, and recreational facilities.
  • C. Louisiana State Parks system
    The Louisiana State Parks system is a network of state-managed parks and historic sites that preserve and showcase Louisiana’s natural landscapes, cultural heritage, and recreational resources.
  • D. Oklahoma state park system
    The Oklahoma state park system is a network of publicly managed parks and natural areas across Oklahoma that preserve the state’s diverse landscapes while providing outdoor recreation and tourism opportunities.
  • E. Kentucky state park system
    The Kentucky state park system is a network of publicly managed parks across Kentucky that preserves the state’s natural, historical, and recreational resources for public use and enjoyment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f197f1e0588190bf073b92be0bf9e4 completed April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:16 p.m.