Triple

T23313745
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta E590647 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. | Statement: [Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, relatedCase, Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
Context triple: [Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, relatedCase, Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.]
  • A. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. chosen
    Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case that clarified the pleading standard for scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
  • B. H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
    H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the "pattern of racketeering activity" requirement under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
  • C. United States v. AT&T
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • D. MCI v. AT&T
    MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
  • E. Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
    Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the scope of private securities fraud lawsuits by holding that secondary actors in a deceptive scheme are not liable under Section 10(b) unless their own conduct is directly relied upon by investors.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1977ee5d08190a9519d7867d6bef9 completed April 29, 2026, 5:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.