Triple

T23313608
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. E590645 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. | Statement: [SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., fullName, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
Context triple: [SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., fullName, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.]
  • A. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. chosen
    SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. is a landmark U.S. securities law case that broadly defined insider trading liability and the disclosure obligations of publicly traded companies under federal law.
  • B. Northern Securities Co. v. United States
    Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
  • C. SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953)
    SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the private offering exemption under the Securities Act by focusing on whether offerees need the protections of registration.
  • D. Chicago Board of Trade v. United States
    Chicago Board of Trade v. United States is a 1918 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that refined the application of the rule of reason to trade restraints under the Sherman Act.
  • E. Eisner v. Macomber
    Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1977ee5d08190a9519d7867d6bef9 completed April 29, 2026, 5:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.