Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976) | Statement: [Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, citationStyle, Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976)]

Target entity: Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976)
Context triple: [Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, citationStyle, Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (1976)]

• A. Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder chosen
  Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that private damages actions under SEC Rule 10b-5 require proof of scienter, not mere negligence.
• B. Eisner v. Macomber
  Eisner v. Macomber is a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a pro rata stock dividend was not taxable income under the Sixteenth Amendment, shaping early federal income tax doctrine.
• C. United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP
  United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case overturning the criminal conviction of Enron’s accounting firm for obstruction of justice, significantly shaping standards for prosecuting corporate document destruction.
• D. SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
  SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. is a landmark U.S. securities law case that broadly defined insider trading liability and the disclosure obligations of publicly traded companies under federal law.
• E. Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.