Triple

T23313557
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder E590643 entity
Predicate subsequentCitationBy P15322 FINISHED
Object Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. | Statement: [Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, subsequentCitationBy, Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.
Context triple: [Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, subsequentCitationBy, Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.]
  • A. Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank chosen
    Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action for aiding and abetting under the federal securities fraud provisions, significantly limiting secondary liability in securities litigation.
  • B. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
    Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
  • C. Veazie Bank v. Fenno
    Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
  • D. United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
    United States v. Philadelphia National Bank is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that established a strict standard for evaluating bank mergers under Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
  • E. FDIC v. Meyer
    FDIC v. Meyer is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limits of suing the federal government and its agencies for constitutional violations under the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1977ee5d08190a9519d7867d6bef9 completed April 29, 2026, 5:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.