Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds | Statement: [Basic Inc. v. Levinson, influencedCase, Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds]

Target entity: Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Context triple: [Basic Inc. v. Levinson, influencedCase, Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds]

• A. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held naturally occurring human genes cannot be patented, reshaping the legal landscape for biotechnology and genetic testing.
• B. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• C. Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
  Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden of proof in patent licensee declaratory judgment actions, holding that the patent holder—not the licensee—bears the burden of proving infringement.
• D. Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
  Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case that reaffirmed but modified the “fraud-on-the-market” presumption of reliance in class action lawsuits.
• E. United States v. Gementera
  United States v. Gementera is a federal appellate case known for upholding a controversial shaming-based condition of supervised release imposed on a mail thief, raising significant debate about the limits of creative sentencing under the Eighth Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Target entity description: Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case that held plaintiffs need not prove the materiality of alleged misstatements at the class certification stage.

• A. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held naturally occurring human genes cannot be patented, reshaping the legal landscape for biotechnology and genetic testing.
• B. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
  Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. is a landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the patentability of medical diagnostic methods by holding that laws of nature and their routine applications are not eligible for patent protection.
• C. Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC
  Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden of proof in patent licensee declaratory judgment actions, holding that the patent holder—not the licensee—bears the burden of proving infringement.
• D. Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
  Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case that reaffirmed but modified the “fraud-on-the-market” presumption of reliance in class action lawsuits.
• E. United States v. Gementera
  United States v. Gementera is a federal appellate case known for upholding a controversial shaming-based condition of supervised release imposed on a mail thief, raising significant debate about the limits of creative sentencing under the Eighth Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen