Triple
T23307347
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baduy people |
E590486
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnicRegion |
P1968
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kanekes village |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kanekes village | Statement: [Baduy people, ethnicRegion, Kanekes village]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kanekes village Context triple: [Baduy people, ethnicRegion, Kanekes village]
-
A.
Kanekes village
chosen
Kanekes village is a traditional rural settlement in Banten, Indonesia, best known as the homeland of the indigenous Baduy people who maintain a highly preserved customary way of life.
-
B.
Ikema village
Ikema village is a small traditional settlement on Ikema Island in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, known for its fishing community and Ryukyuan cultural heritage.
-
C.
Ngadas village
Ngadas village is a traditional Tenggerese settlement in East Java, Indonesia, known for its scenic highland landscapes and role as a cultural gateway to Mount Bromo.
-
D.
Izena Village
Izena Village is the local governing municipality of Izena Island in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan.
-
E.
Sipa village
Sipa village is a small rural settlement located in Rapla County in western Estonia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1972846fc819092ca2b9590b2e177 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:05 p.m.