Triple
T23294345
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ixtenco Otomi |
E590121
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Otomi language variety |
C47477
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Otomi language variety Context triple: [Ixtenco Otomi, instanceOf, Otomi language variety]
-
A.
Amuzgo language variety
An Amuzgo language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Amuzgo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Amuzgo linguistic continuum.
-
B.
Subanen language variety
A Subanen language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Subanen language spoken by Subanen communities in the Zamboanga Peninsula and surrounding areas of the southern Philippines, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features.
-
C.
Yavapai language variety
A Yavapai language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Yavapai language, distinguished by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features used by a particular Yavapai-speaking community.
-
D.
Luri language variety
A Luri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Luri language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader continuum of Southwestern Iranian dialects.
-
E.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1af9d88190a0b9b5e8fa608618 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:02 p.m.