Triple
T23281203
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rice's theorem |
E588867
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Post's theorem |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Post's theorem | Statement: [Rice's theorem, relatedTo, Post's theorem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Post's theorem Context triple: [Rice's theorem, relatedTo, Post's theorem]
-
A.
Rice's theorem
Rice's theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory stating that any non-trivial semantic property of the language recognized by a Turing machine is undecidable.
-
B.
Löb's theorem
Löb's theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that characterizes when a sufficiently strong formal system can prove statements about its own provability, closely refining the insights of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems.
-
C.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
D.
Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem
The Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a class of structures is first-order axiomatizable, linking definability properties with closure under ultraproducts and isomorphisms.
-
E.
Kleene’s recursion theorem
Kleene’s recursion theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory that guarantees the existence of self-referential programs, allowing a program to effectively obtain and use its own description.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Post's theorem Target entity description: Post's theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory that characterizes the arithmetical hierarchy by relating levels of definability to the Turing jump operation.
-
A.
Rice's theorem
Rice's theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory stating that any non-trivial semantic property of the language recognized by a Turing machine is undecidable.
-
B.
Löb's theorem
Löb's theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that characterizes when a sufficiently strong formal system can prove statements about its own provability, closely refining the insights of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems.
-
C.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
D.
Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem
The Tarski–Mostowski–Robinson theorem is a fundamental result in model theory that characterizes when a class of structures is first-order axiomatizable, linking definability properties with closure under ultraproducts and isomorphisms.
-
E.
Kleene’s recursion theorem
Kleene’s recursion theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory that guarantees the existence of self-referential programs, allowing a program to effectively obtain and use its own description.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d16e2c08190a291de254703129e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19642b46481909fd455acd2155792 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:57 p.m.