Triple
T23238536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fremont River |
E581370
|
entity |
| Predicate | passesNear |
P416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hanksville, Utah |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hanksville, Utah | Statement: [Fremont River, passesNear, Hanksville, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hanksville, Utah Context triple: [Fremont River, passesNear, Hanksville, Utah]
-
A.
Hanksville, Utah
chosen
Hanksville, Utah is a small rural town in south-central Utah known as a gateway to nearby desert landscapes, including the San Rafael Swell and other popular outdoor recreation areas.
-
B.
Hinckley, Utah
Hinckley, Utah is a small rural town in western Utah known for its agricultural community and proximity to the Sevier Desert.
-
C.
Hoytsville, Utah
Hoytsville, Utah is a small unincorporated rural community in northeastern Utah known for its agricultural character and proximity to the Wasatch Mountains.
-
D.
Woodruff, Utah
Woodruff, Utah is a small rural town in northeastern Utah known for its ranching heritage and high-elevation, cold-weather climate.
-
E.
Holden, Utah
Holden, Utah is a small rural town in central Utah known for its agricultural community and quiet, close-knit atmosphere.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2460556f88190be1744a84a84173f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f192ebaef4819083a7805537ad993f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:10 p.m.