Triple
T2323800
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Law Division (Circuit Court of Cook County) |
E48239
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseTypeExcludes |
P3119
|
FINISHED |
| Object | criminal prosecutions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criminal prosecutions | Statement: [Law Division (Circuit Court of Cook County), caseTypeExcludes, criminal prosecutions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseTypeExcludes Context triple: [Law Division (Circuit Court of Cook County), caseTypeExcludes, criminal prosecutions]
-
A.
excludes
chosen
Indicates that one entity deliberately omits, leaves out, or does not allow the inclusion of another entity within a set, group, or context.
-
B.
excludedFrom
Indicates that one entity is deliberately not included within the scope, membership, or applicability of another entity or set.
-
C.
exemptionType
Indicates the specific category or kind of exemption that applies in a given context.
-
D.
exclusionBasis
Indicates the reason or criterion used to exclude an entity from a set, process, or consideration.
-
E.
acquisitionExcludes
Indicates that a particular acquisition explicitly does not include certain entities, assets, or rights within its scope.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa308a88190b0b86c011fda7fce |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc685f05481909c863b29d1f6bacd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5909cc48190aab257313542dc49 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:49 p.m.