Triple
T23217054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marshall, Missouri |
E580774
|
entity |
| Predicate | namedAfter |
P63
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Marshall |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Marshall | Statement: [Marshall, Missouri, namedAfter, John Marshall]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: John Marshall Context triple: [Marshall, Missouri, namedAfter, John Marshall]
-
A.
John Marshall
John Marshall was a Scottish sculptor known for his architectural and public works, including prominent sculptures in Edinburgh.
-
B.
John Marshall
John Marshall was a British archaeologist and Director-General of the Archaeological Survey of India who played a key role in uncovering and studying the ancient Indus Valley Civilization.
-
C.
John Marshall
John Marshall is an American higher education administrator who serves as president of Colorado Mesa University in Grand Junction, Colorado.
-
D.
John Marshall
John Marshall is a member of the National Health organization, contributing to its work in the health sector.
-
E.
John Marshall
chosen
John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States, whose landmark opinions, especially in Marbury v. Madison, established the principle of judicial review and greatly strengthened the Supreme Court’s authority.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2460389408190be74f41d217799a9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19165949c81908e4d66a8a2b0a25a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:04 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:08 p.m.