Triple

T2321055
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PEP 572 E51179 entity
Predicate syntaxChoiceReason P5327 FINISHED
Object use of := inspired by languages like Go and Pascal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of := inspired by languages like Go and Pascal | Statement: [PEP 572, syntaxChoiceReason, use of := inspired by languages like Go and Pascal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: syntaxChoiceReason
Context triple: [PEP 572, syntaxChoiceReason, use of := inspired by languages like Go and Pascal]
  • A. selectionReason
    Indicates the reason or justification for choosing or selecting one entity over alternatives.
  • B. syntaxBasedOn chosen
    Indicates that the syntactic structure or rules of one entity are derived from, influenced by, or constructed according to the syntax of another entity.
  • C. statedReason
    Indicates that one entity expresses or provides another entity as the explanation, justification, or motive for an action, event, or claim.
  • D. reasonForUse
    Indicates that one entity specifies the justification, purpose, or motivation for using another entity.
  • E. decisionBasis
    Indicates the underlying reason, criterion, or rationale on which a decision is made.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b074b908190ae983dbca7757d88 completed March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc685f05481909c863b29d1f6bacd completed March 7, 2026, 6:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc5909cc48190aab257313542dc49 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:49 p.m.