Triple
T23119643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moore v. Texas |
E576853
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Moore v. Texas (2019) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Moore v. Texas (2019) | Statement: [Moore v. Texas, relatedCase, Moore v. Texas (2019)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Moore v. Texas (2019) Context triple: [Moore v. Texas, relatedCase, Moore v. Texas (2019)]
-
A.
Moore v. Texas
chosen
Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
-
B.
United States v. Texas (2021)
United States v. Texas (2021) is a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the constitutionality and enforcement mechanism of Texas’s restrictive abortion law known as Senate Bill 8.
-
C.
Sossamon v. Texas
Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
-
D.
Carmell v. Texas
Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.
-
E.
Texas v. White
Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18e4ece5481908d05b4b1e6a07db3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.