Triple

T23119608
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hall v. Florida E576852 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Moore v. Texas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Moore v. Texas | Statement: [Hall v. Florida, relatedCase, Moore v. Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Moore v. Texas
Context triple: [Hall v. Florida, relatedCase, Moore v. Texas]
  • A. Moore v. Texas chosen
    Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
  • B. Sossamon v. Texas
    Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
  • C. Jurek v. Texas
    Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.
  • D. Carmell v. Texas
    Carmell v. Texas is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that a law easing the evidentiary requirements for conviction in certain sexual offense cases could not be applied retroactively.
  • E. Aguilar v. Texas
    Aguilar v. Texas is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a two-pronged test for evaluating the sufficiency of informants’ tips in supporting probable cause for search warrants.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18e4ece5481908d05b4b1e6a07db3 completed April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.