Triple

T23119482
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Penry v. Lynaugh E576850 entity
Predicate respondentPosition P9299 FINISHED
Object Director, Texas Department of Corrections NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Director, Texas Department of Corrections | Statement: [Penry v. Lynaugh, respondentPosition, Director, Texas Department of Corrections]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Context triple: [Penry v. Lynaugh, respondentPosition, Director, Texas Department of Corrections]
  • A. Arizona Department of Corrections director
    The Arizona Department of Corrections director is the top official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system, including the management, policies, and operations of all Arizona correctional facilities.
  • B. Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction
    The Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction is the chief executive official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system and correctional policies in Indiana.
  • C. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
    The Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections is the chief executive official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system, inmate rehabilitation, and correctional policies in Florida.
  • D. New York City Commissioner of Correction
    The New York City Commissioner of Correction is the head of the New York City Department of Correction, overseeing the management, operations, and policies of the city’s jail system.
  • E. Attorney General of Texas
    The Attorney General of Texas is the state's chief legal officer, responsible for representing Texas in legal matters, enforcing state law, and providing legal advice to state agencies and officials.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Target entity description: The Director of the Texas Department of Corrections is the chief official responsible for overseeing the administration, operation, and policies of the state’s prison system.
  • A. Arizona Department of Corrections director
    The Arizona Department of Corrections director is the top official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system, including the management, policies, and operations of all Arizona correctional facilities.
  • B. Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction
    The Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction is the chief executive official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system and correctional policies in Indiana.
  • C. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections
    The Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections is the chief executive official responsible for overseeing the state’s prison system, inmate rehabilitation, and correctional policies in Florida.
  • D. New York City Commissioner of Correction
    The New York City Commissioner of Correction is the head of the New York City Department of Correction, overseeing the management, operations, and policies of the city’s jail system.
  • E. Attorney General of Texas
    The Attorney General of Texas is the state's chief legal officer, responsible for representing Texas in legal matters, enforcing state law, and providing legal advice to state agencies and officials.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18e4ece5481908d05b4b1e6a07db3 completed April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.