Triple

T230839
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Higgs boson E4406 entity
Predicate isFermion P7809 FINISHED
Object false LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: false | Statement: [Higgs boson, isFermion, false]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFermion
Context triple: [Higgs boson, isFermion, false]
  • A. isBoson chosen
    Indicates that the subject is a boson, i.e., a particle that follows Bose–Einstein statistics and typically mediates forces or can occupy the same quantum state as others.
  • B. isOwnAntiparticle
    Indicates that an entity is identical to its own antiparticle, meaning it serves simultaneously as both particle and antiparticle in that relationship.
  • C. isGaugeBosonOf
    Indicates that one particle serves as the gauge boson mediating the fundamental interaction associated with another entity (such as a force or symmetry group).
  • D. hasWeakIsospin
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specified value of weak isospin, representing its charge under the weak nuclear interaction.
  • E. hasIsospin
    Indicates that one particle possesses a specific isospin value or quantum number in relation to another reference or classification framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257363ffc81909757bde7ab3404da completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25e0868708190ad551ca06cc57f4a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b5a075081909b0e9b88c1492d5a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.