Triple
T23047466
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Andrew Pickens |
E573916
|
entity |
| Predicate | participatedIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Siege of Augusta |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Siege of Augusta | Statement: [Andrew Pickens, participatedIn, Siege of Augusta]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Siege of Augusta Context triple: [Andrew Pickens, participatedIn, Siege of Augusta]
-
A.
Siege of Prome
The Siege of Prome was a key 1825 military engagement in the First Anglo-Burmese War, where British forces successfully defended the strategic town of Prome against Burmese attempts to retake it.
-
B.
Siege of Amisus
The Siege of Amisus was a key Roman assault on the Pontic city of Amisus during the Third Mithridatic War, exemplifying Rome’s campaign to break King Mithridates VI’s power in Asia Minor.
-
C.
Siege of Ramsej
The Siege of Ramsej was a late 17th-century conflict in which Maratha forces tenaciously defended the Ramsej fort against the Mughal Empire during the protracted struggle for control over western India.
-
D.
Siege of Atella
The Siege of Atella was a 1496 Italian Wars engagement in which Spanish forces under Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba captured the Neapolitan town of Atella from French control.
-
E.
Siege of Perusia
The Siege of Perusia was a key conflict in 41–40 BC during the Roman civil wars, in which Octavian besieged and captured the Italian city of Perusia, weakening his rivals Lucius Antonius and Fulvia and consolidating his path to power.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Siege of Augusta Target entity description: The Siege of Augusta was a 1781 American Revolutionary War engagement in Georgia in which Patriot forces captured the British-held town of Augusta, weakening British control in the Southern colonies.
-
A.
Siege of Prome
The Siege of Prome was a key 1825 military engagement in the First Anglo-Burmese War, where British forces successfully defended the strategic town of Prome against Burmese attempts to retake it.
-
B.
Siege of Amisus
The Siege of Amisus was a key Roman assault on the Pontic city of Amisus during the Third Mithridatic War, exemplifying Rome’s campaign to break King Mithridates VI’s power in Asia Minor.
-
C.
Siege of Ramsej
The Siege of Ramsej was a late 17th-century conflict in which Maratha forces tenaciously defended the Ramsej fort against the Mughal Empire during the protracted struggle for control over western India.
-
D.
Siege of Atella
The Siege of Atella was a 1496 Italian Wars engagement in which Spanish forces under Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba captured the Neapolitan town of Atella from French control.
-
E.
Siege of Perusia
The Siege of Perusia was a key conflict in 41–40 BC during the Roman civil wars, in which Octavian besieged and captured the Italian city of Perusia, weakening his rivals Lucius Antonius and Fulvia and consolidating his path to power.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b9c11481909d06c872214d21af |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18678e5c48190a96a7b4c9c82f8fe |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:54 p.m.