Triple

T23041875
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Google Latitude E573757 entity
Predicate hasPrivacyConcern P15698 FINISHED
Object location tracking LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: location tracking | Statement: [Google Latitude, hasPrivacyConcern, location tracking]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrivacyConcern
Context triple: [Google Latitude, hasPrivacyConcern, location tracking]
  • A. privacyProperty chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a characteristic, rule, or condition specifically related to privacy in the context of the relationship.
  • B. soughtPrivacy
    Indicates that an entity intentionally attempted to obtain or maintain privacy from others.
  • C. privacyCharacteristic
    Indicates the specific privacy-related property or feature that characterizes how information is handled, protected, or exposed in a given context.
  • D. hasConfidentialityObligation
    Indicates that an entity is bound by a duty to keep certain information secret and not disclose it to unauthorized parties.
  • E. hasSecurityConsideration
    Indicates that there is a relevant security-related issue, risk, or precaution associated with the referenced entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b9c11481909d06c872214d21af completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18513fc54819096d761a0be75b774 completed April 29, 2026, 4:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef89d5f71881908b9f9d0c8aab278c completed April 27, 2026, 4:07 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:54 p.m.