Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe | Statement: [Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., notableFor, landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe]

Target entity: landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
Context triple: [Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., notableFor, landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe]

• A. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe chosen
  Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
• B. Kelo v. City of New London
  Kelo v. City of New London is a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the interpretation of “public use” under the Takings Clause to allow government seizure of private property for economic development projects.
• C. United States v. National City Lines, Inc. (1949)
  United States v. National City Lines, Inc. (1949) was a U.S. antitrust case involving a major streetcar and bus operator accused, along with corporate partners, of conspiring to monopolize and dismantle electric streetcar systems in favor of buses and related products.
• D. National League of Cities v. Usery
  National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
• E. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
  Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on symbolic protest camping in public parks, clarifying the limits of expressive conduct protections under the First Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.